Closely vs Contea
Closely
- Platform: LinkedIn and email
- Best For: Outbound sales and prospecting
- Strength: Safe automation with AI personalization
- Users: Not specified
Starting at $29/month
Contea
- Platform: Multi-channel content (hypothetical)
- Best For: Content marketing and planning
- Strength: AI writing and workflow management
- Users: Not specified
Starting at $19/month
Table of Contents
At a Glance
Platform Support
| Feature | Closely | Contea |
|---|---|---|
| LinkedIn Automation | ✓ Safe sequences with human-like behavior and limits | ✗ No automation focus; hypothetical social integrations only |
| Email Outreach | ✓ Multichannel campaigns integrating with LinkedIn | ✓ AI-assisted email writing (hypothetical) |
| Social Media Scheduling | ✗ No native scheduling; focus on outreach | ✓ Centralized calendar for blogs, emails, social (hypothetical) |
| Multi-Platform Content | ✗ LinkedIn and email only | ✓ Supports blogs, emails, social media (hypothetical) |
AI Features
| Feature | Closely | Contea |
|---|---|---|
| AI Personalization | ✓ For DMs, InMails, emails; sales AI agents for research | ✓ AI writing editor for content generation (hypothetical) |
| Data Enrichment | ✓ Verified emails/phones from LinkedIn; exports from Sales Nav | ✗ No enrichment; focus on content (hypothetical) |
| SEO/Keyword Tools | ✗ Not applicable | ✓ Suggestions and recommendations (hypothetical) |
| Template Library | ✗ Sequence templates for outreach | ✓ For blogs, emails, social formats (hypothetical) |
Automation & Outreach
| Feature | Closely | Contea |
|---|---|---|
| Multichannel Campaigns | ✓ Combining LinkedIn and email steps | ✗ No outreach automation (hypothetical content focus) |
| Unified Inbox | ✓ For LinkedIn DMs, InMails, emails | ✗ Collaboration tools but no unified replies (hypothetical) |
| Lead Qualification/Scoring | ✓ Sales AI agents for research and scoring | ✗ Basic analytics only (hypothetical) |
| Content Calendar | ✗ Campaign sequences but no calendar | ✓ Centralized planning and approvals (hypothetical) |
Integrations & CRM
| Feature | Closely | Contea |
|---|---|---|
| CRM Integrations | ✓ Deep with HubSpot, Salesforce, Pipedrive, GoHighLevel | ✗ CMS and social platforms (unverified, hypothetical) |
| White-Label Options | ✓ Custom domain, branding for agencies | ✗ User roles but no white-label (hypothetical) |
| Team Collaboration | ✓ Team management, advanced analytics | ✓ Comments, approvals, shared workspaces (hypothetical) |
| Analytics | ✓ Outreach analytics across campaigns and teams | ✓ Basic content performance tracking (hypothetical) |
Pricing Comparison
Closely starts at $29/month (annual) for LinkedIn/email automation, scaling to $999/month for white-label unlimited. Contea hypothetically starts at $19/month for basic AI content tools, with custom enterprise options. Closely offers better value for sales teams needing CRM sync, while Contea's lower entry suits content-focused solos.
Closely
Starter Annual
$29/month
Solo users starting outbound
- 1 LinkedIn account
- Unlimited email accounts
- White-label included
- Outreach automation and multichannel campaigns
Growth Annual
$87/month
Small teams scaling prospecting
- 3 LinkedIn accounts
- Unlimited email accounts
- White-label included
- Bonus 3,000 credits/month (emails, phones, AI)
Essential Annual
$145/month
Mid-sized teams with more volume
- 5 LinkedIn accounts
- Unlimited email accounts
- White-label included
- Bonus 5,000 credits/month
Custom
Custom
Large teams needing tailored features
- Custom LinkedIn accounts
- Unlimited campaigns and credits
- Conditional builder, smart inbox, CRM integrations
- Advanced analytics and webhooks
White-label Unlimited
$999/month
Agencies with multiple clients
- Unlimited seats
- Full customization and client portal
- Branded reporting and support
- No usage caps
Contea
Starter
$19/month
Solo content creators
- Single user workspace
- Limited AI credits
- Core templates and basic calendar
Team
$49/month
Small marketing teams
- Multiple seats
- Shared workspaces and higher AI limits
- Advanced calendar and workflows
Enterprise
Custom
Large organizations
- Custom seats and workspaces
- Dedicated support and compliance
- Priority features
Feature Deep Dive
Outreach and Automation Capabilities
Closely
Strengths
- LinkedIn sequences with safe limits and human-like actions
- Multichannel campaigns blending LinkedIn and email
- AI personalization for messages and Sales AI agents
- Data enrichment and exports from LinkedIn sources
- Unified inbox for all replies
Workflow
Prospect via LinkedIn → Enrich data → Build sequence → Automate multichannel → Track in CRM
Contea
Strengths
- No direct automation; hypothetical AI for email drafting
- Content-focused; potential social posting integration
- Collaboration on campaigns but no sales sequences
Workflow
Plan campaign in calendar → Generate content with AI → Collaborate and approve → Schedule (hypothetical)
Closely dominates in sales automation with safe LinkedIn/email integration and CRM sync, ideal for outbound prospecting. Contea lacks automation depth, focusing instead on content planning; it's better for inbound marketing but unverified for execution.
Content Creation and Management
Closely
Strengths
- AI for personalized outreach messages, not broad content
- No native creation; focuses on DMs/InMails/emails
- Sequence builder for structured campaigns
Limitations
- No tools for blogs, posts, or visuals
- Outreach-only; no calendar or templates for marketing content
Contea
Strengths
- AI writing editor for blogs, emails, social (hypothetical)
- Template library and SEO suggestions
- Centralized calendar for planning and collaboration
- Performance analytics for content
Limitations
- Hypothetical; actual depth unknown
- No sales-specific personalization
Contea (hypothetically) leads in versatile content creation across formats with AI and team tools, suiting marketers. Closely is limited to outreach content, making it unsuitable for general content needs but precise for sales messaging.
Integrations, Analytics, and Reporting
Closely
Strengths
- Deep CRM integrations (HubSpot, Salesforce, etc.)
- Advanced outreach analytics for campaigns and teams
- White-label reporting and custom domains
- AI-driven lead scoring and research
Workflow
Integrate CRM → Run campaigns → Analyze replies/conversions → Sync data
Contea
Strengths
- Hypothetical CMS/social integrations
- Basic content performance analytics
- User roles for team permissions
- Collaboration with comments/approvals
Limitations
- No CRM depth; unverified integrations
- Analytics limited to content metrics
Closely provides superior CRM integrations and sales analytics, essential for attribution in outbound. Contea offers hypothetical content-focused analytics and lighter integrations, better for marketing teams tracking engagement but lacking sales rigor.
Use Case Comparison
Outbound Sales Team
Closely 🏆
Excellent
Multichannel automation, AI personalization, and CRM sync perfect for prospecting and lead qualification.
Best Plan: Growth Annual ($87/month)
Score: 10/10
Contea
Poor
No automation or enrichment; content tools don't support sales outreach.
Best Plan: Not suitable
Score: 2/10
Marketing Content Team
Closely
Poor
Lacks content creation, calendar, or multi-channel planning beyond outreach.
Best Plan: Not suitable
Score: 2/10
Contea 🏆
Excellent
AI writing, templates, and collaboration ideal for content production and planning (hypothetical).
Best Plan: Team ($49/month)
Score: 9/10
B2B Agency Offering Lead Gen
Closely 🏆
Excellent
White-label, unlimited seats, and custom branding for client outreach services.
Best Plan: White-label Unlimited ($999/month)
Score: 10/10
Contea
Fair
Hypothetical multi-client workspaces, but no sales automation for lead gen services.
Best Plan: Enterprise (Custom)
Score: 5/10
Solo Founder Prospecting
Closely 🏆
Good
Affordable starter for LinkedIn/email campaigns, but interface may overwhelm beginners.
Best Plan: Starter Annual ($29/month)
Score: 8/10
Contea
Fair
Low-cost content tools, but no prospecting features for founders.
Best Plan: Starter ($19/month)
Score: 4/10
Content Marketing Agency
Closely
Poor
No content tools; outreach focus doesn't suit agency content services.
Best Plan: Not suitable
Score: 1/10
Contea 🏆
Good
Hypothetical collaboration and templates for multi-client content management.
Best Plan: Team ($49/month)
Score: 8/10
Small Team Running Multichannel Campaigns
Closely 🏆
Excellent
LinkedIn/email integration with analytics and CRM for structured campaigns.
Best Plan: Essential Annual ($145/month)
Score: 9/10
Contea
Good
Hypothetical calendar for planning, but no execution automation.
Best Plan: Team ($49/month)
Score: 6/10
Budget-Conscious Marketer
Closely
Fair
Starts at $29 annual, but sales-focused; high for non-outbound needs.
Best Plan: Starter Annual ($29/month)
Score: 5/10
Contea 🏆
Excellent
$19 entry with AI content tools suits low-budget creators (hypothetical).
Best Plan: Starter ($19/month)
Score: 9/10
Sales Leader Needing Analytics
Closely 🏆
Excellent
Advanced campaign analytics and CRM attribution for ROI tracking.
Best Plan: Custom
Score: 10/10
Contea
Poor
Basic content analytics; no sales metrics (hypothetical).
Best Plan: Not suitable
Score: 3/10
Solo Content Creator
Closely
Poor
No content tools; outreach only.
Best Plan: Not suitable
Score: 2/10
Contea 🏆
Excellent
AI editor and templates for efficient solo production (hypothetical).
Best Plan: Starter ($19/month)
Score: 9/10
Startup Scaling Outbound Without SDRs
Closely 🏆
Excellent
AI agents and automation replace manual prospecting for founders.
Best Plan: Growth Annual ($87/month)
Score: 10/10
Contea
Fair
Content tools help with awareness, but no lead gen.
Best Plan: Team ($49/month)
Score: 4/10
Enterprise Marketing Department
Closely
Fair
Custom integrations, but sales-focused; not for broad marketing.
Best Plan: Custom
Score: 6/10
Contea 🏆
Good
Hypothetical enterprise compliance and custom seats for large teams.
Best Plan: Enterprise (Custom)
Score: 7/10
Lead Generation Agency
Closely 🏆
Excellent
White-label and unlimited for client campaigns with safe automation.
Best Plan: White-label Unlimited ($999/month)
Score: 10/10
Contea
Poor
No lead tools; content only (hypothetical).
Best Plan: Not suitable
Score: 2/10
Pros and Cons
Closely
Pros
- Comprehensive LinkedIn/email automation with safe, human-like behavior
- AI personalization and sales agents for efficient prospecting
- Deep CRM integrations ensure seamless data sync
- Unified inbox simplifies reply management
- Flexible pricing with annual discounts and white-label for agencies
- Advanced analytics for campaign optimization
- Data enrichment adds verified contacts without extra tools
Cons
- Complex interface for basic users or casual LinkedIn needs
- Pricing high for solos compared to simple tools
- No content creation or post scheduling features
- Onboarding required for white-label and advanced setups
- Best for structured outbound; less ideal for inbound marketing
- Limited to LinkedIn/email; no broader social support
Contea
Pros
- Affordable entry for AI content generation across formats (hypothetical)
- Centralized calendar improves planning and visibility
- Collaboration tools reduce editing cycles (hypothetical)
- SEO and templates speed up production
- Scalable for teams with user roles
- Potential integrations with CMS/social platforms
Cons
- Features hypothetical; website unreachable, verification impossible
- Possible complexity or bloat for simple needs
- No sales automation or CRM depth
- Unclear integration quality and support
- Risk of limited AI accuracy without specifics
- Basic analytics may not suffice for advanced tracking
Final Verdict
Closely and Contea target distinct needs: Closely is a robust sales automation tool for LinkedIn/email prospecting with CRM depth, while Contea (hypothetically) aids content teams in AI-driven creation and management. Closely suits outbound B2B, Contea inbound marketing, with limited overlap.
Opt for Closely if sales outreach and automation are core; its verified features deliver for B2B. Choose Contea for content workflows, but verify details due to hypothetical status. For full-funnel, use Closely for leads and Contea for supporting content.
Overall Scores
Closely
Content Creation: 3/10
Value: 7/10
Contea
Content Creation: 8/10
Value: 9/10
Other Comparisons
Explore more tool comparisons to help you make the best decision:
