PhantomBuster vs Make
PhantomBuster
- Platform: LinkedIn, Sales Navigator, and select platforms
- Best For: Lead generation and sales automation
- Strength: Prebuilt Phantoms for prospecting
- Users: Thousands of sales and growth teams
Starting at $59/month
Make (formerly Integromat)
- Platform: 1,000+ apps and APIs
- Best For: General workflow automation and integrations
- Strength: Visual drag-and-drop builder
- Users: Millions of users in marketing, operations, and IT
Starting at $9/month
Table of Contents
At a Glance
Automation Focus
| Feature | PhantomBuster | Make (formerly Integromat) |
|---|---|---|
| Prebuilt automation scripts | ✓ Extensive library of Phantoms for LinkedIn and lead gen tasks | ✗ No prebuilt scripts; focuses on custom scenarios |
| Visual drag-and-drop builder | ✗ Workflow builder for chaining Phantoms, but less visual | ✓ Core drag-and-drop scenario builder for any workflow |
| Data extraction and enrichment | ✓ Specialized for leads from LinkedIn and other sources | ✓ General data handling via modules and APIs |
| Complex branching logic | ✗ Basic triggers and scheduling | ✓ Routers, filters, and advanced logic |
Platform Support
| Feature | PhantomBuster | Make (formerly Integromat) |
|---|---|---|
| LinkedIn and Sales Navigator | ✓ Deep integration with prebuilt Phantoms | ✓ Via app modules, but less specialized |
| CRM integrations (e.g., HubSpot, Salesforce) | ✓ Direct integrations for lead enrichment | ✓ Extensive prebuilt modules for multiple CRMs |
| Email and outreach tools | ✓ Focused on LinkedIn outreach automation | ✓ Broad support for email apps like Gmail, Mailchimp |
| General API/HTTP support | ✓ API access for custom use cases | ✓ Webhooks and HTTP modules for any REST API |
| Multi-app ecosystem (1,000+) | ✗ Limited to sales-focused integrations | ✓ Thousands of app integrations across categories |
Data Handling
| Feature | PhantomBuster | Make (formerly Integromat) |
|---|---|---|
| Data extraction from social platforms | ✓ Specialized for LinkedIn profiles and leads | ✓ Via app-specific modules or scrapers |
| Data transformation and mapping | ✗ Basic data enrichment | ✓ Advanced mapping, aggregation, and transformation tools |
| Error handling and retries | ✓ Execution logs and error reporting | ✓ Detailed logs, retry controls, and branching for errors |
| Scheduling and triggers | ✓ Recurring automations and triggers | ✓ Real-time, interval, and on-demand scheduling |
Collaboration and Scalability
| Feature | PhantomBuster | Make (formerly Integromat) |
|---|---|---|
| Team workspaces | ✓ Shared workspaces in Team plan | ✓ Shared workspaces with role-based access |
| API access for custom extensions | ✓ For advanced custom automations | ✓ Full API for enterprise integrations |
| Enterprise governance | ✓ Custom SLAs and security reviews | ✓ Advanced security, compliance, and governance features |
Integrations and Extensibility
| Feature | PhantomBuster | Make (formerly Integromat) |
|---|---|---|
| Zapier integration | ✓ For extending Phantoms | ✓ Native alternative to Zapier with more power |
| Spreadsheet/CSV handling | ✓ For lead data export | ✓ Modules for Google Sheets, Excel, etc. |
| Custom code modules | ✗ No-code focused | ✓ Supports JavaScript for custom logic |
| Webhook support | ✗ Limited to triggers | ✓ Full webhook modules for real-time events |
Pricing Comparison
PhantomBuster starts at $59/month with a focus on sales automation, while Make starts at just $9/month for broad workflow automation. PhantomBuster's pricing scales with usage for lead gen tasks, whereas Make's operation-based model offers better entry-level value but can rise with volume.
PhantomBuster
Free
Free
Testing basic Phantoms
- Limited number of Phantoms
- Restricted daily execution time
- Basic support and documentation access
Starter
$59/month
Solo users starting lead gen
- Increased daily execution time compared with free tier
- Access to core Phantom library
- Basic workflow automation capabilities
Pro
$139/month
Growing teams with higher volume
- More concurrent Phantoms and higher daily execution limits
- Priority execution and faster runs
- Expanded workflow and integration options
Team
$399/month
Collaborative sales teams
- Significantly higher usage limits and concurrent automations
- Team collaboration features and shared workspaces
- Enhanced support response times
Enterprise
Custom
Large organizations
- Custom usage limits and SLAs
- Security reviews and procurement support
- Dedicated onboarding and account management
Make (formerly Integromat)
Free
Free
Beginners learning automation
- Limited operations per month
- Basic access to scenario builder
- Access to a subset of app integrations
- Community support
Core
$9/month
Individuals with light usage
- Increased monthly operations compared with Free
- Access to most standard app integrations
- Scheduling and basic error handling
- Support for several active scenarios
Pro
$16/month
Advanced individual users
- Higher monthly operation limits
- Priority execution for scenarios
- More advanced modules and integrations
- Improved support response times
Teams
$29/month
Small teams collaborating
- Team workspaces and collaboration features
- Role-based access controls
- Higher operation quotas for growing teams
- More advanced monitoring and governance options
Enterprise
Custom
Large-scale deployments
- Custom operation and data limits
- Dedicated account management and onboarding
- Advanced security, compliance, and governance
- Priority support and SLA options
Feature Deep Dive
Automation Building Capabilities
PhantomBuster
Strengths
- Prebuilt Phantoms for quick setup of lead gen tasks
- Workflow builder to chain Phantoms into sequences
- Easy for non-technical users to automate repetitive sales actions
- Scheduling and triggers for recurring prospecting
Workflow
Select Phantom → Configure inputs → Chain in workflow → Schedule runs → Monitor logs
Make (formerly Integromat)
Strengths
- Visual drag-and-drop scenario builder for any complexity
- Extensive app modules for seamless connections
- Advanced data mapping and transformation
- Routers and filters for conditional logic
Workflow
Drag modules → Connect apps → Map data → Add logic/filters → Schedule or trigger → Test and deploy
PhantomBuster shines for quick, prebuilt sales automations, especially LinkedIn, making it ideal for outbound teams. Make offers superior flexibility for custom, multi-app workflows but requires more initial design effort. Choose PhantomBuster for speed in lead gen; Make for broad, complex integrations.
Data Extraction and Enrichment
PhantomBuster
Strengths
- Specialized Phantoms for extracting LinkedIn profiles, emails, and leads
- Automatic data enrichment for contact records
- Export to CRMs or spreadsheets
- Handles platform limits with careful configuration
Workflow
Run extraction Phantom → Enrich data → Export to CRM → Trigger follow-up
Limitations
- Focused on social/sales data; less for general sources
- Risk of platform violations if not monitored
Make (formerly Integromat)
Strengths
- HTTP and app modules for extracting from any API or site
- Data transformation for cleaning and enriching
- Integration with enrichment services via modules
- Scalable for large datasets
Limitations
- Less prebuilt for social extraction; more custom setup
- Requires API knowledge for advanced cases
PhantomBuster is unmatched for LinkedIn and sales data extraction with ready-to-use tools. Make provides versatile extraction for any source but demands more configuration. For B2B lead gen, PhantomBuster wins; for general data workflows, Make is better.
Integrations and Scheduling
PhantomBuster
Strengths
- Native integrations with CRMs, Zapier, and spreadsheets
- Recurring schedules and event-based triggers
- API for custom extensions
Limitations
- Fewer app integrations than general platforms
- Scheduling tied to Phantom execution limits
Make (formerly Integromat)
Strengths
- 1,000+ prebuilt app integrations
- Flexible scheduling: real-time, intervals, on-demand
- Webhooks for instant triggers
- Custom code for unique needs
Limitations
- Operation counts affect cost for frequent runs
- Overwhelming for simple integrations
Make dominates with its vast integration library and advanced scheduling options, suitable for enterprise-wide automations. PhantomBuster offers targeted integrations for sales tools with straightforward scheduling. Opt for Make for ecosystem-wide connections; PhantomBuster for sales-specific ones.
Monitoring, Error Handling, and Collaboration
PhantomBuster
Strengths
- Execution logs and error reporting for debugging
- Team workspaces for shared automations
- Priority support in higher tiers
Limitations
- Less advanced governance for enterprises
- Collaboration limited to Team plan
Make (formerly Integromat)
Strengths
- Detailed logs, retry controls, and error branching
- Role-based access and team workspaces
- Advanced monitoring and governance in Enterprise
Limitations
- Learning curve for complex error setups
Both provide solid monitoring, but Make's advanced error handling and collaboration features make it better for teams building intricate workflows. PhantomBuster suffices for sales teams but lacks depth in governance. For collaborative, error-resilient automations, Make excels.
Use Case Comparison
Outbound Sales Team on LinkedIn
PhantomBuster 🏆
Excellent
Prebuilt Phantoms for prospecting, extraction, and outreach automation tailored to LinkedIn.
Best Plan: Pro ($139/month) for higher limits
Score: 10/10
Make (formerly Integromat)
Good
Can build LinkedIn integrations but lacks prebuilts; more setup time.
Best Plan: Pro ($16/month)
Score: 7/10
Growth Marketer Running Experiments
PhantomBuster
Good
Strong for lead gen experiments on LinkedIn; limited for multi-channel.
Best Plan: Starter ($59/month)
Score: 8/10
Make (formerly Integromat) 🏆
Excellent
Flexible for A/B testing workflows across apps and channels.
Best Plan: Core ($9/month)
Score: 9/10
Agency Managing Lead Gen for Clients
PhantomBuster 🏆
Excellent
Shared workspaces and Phantoms for multi-client prospecting.
Best Plan: Team ($399/month)
Score: 9/10
Make (formerly Integromat)
Good
Team features for collaboration, but custom builds per client.
Best Plan: Teams ($29/month)
Score: 8/10
Startup Scaling Prospecting
PhantomBuster 🏆
Excellent
Cost-effective for early lead gen without hiring.
Best Plan: Starter ($59/month)
Score: 9/10
Make (formerly Integromat)
Fair
Good for integrations but overkill for simple prospecting.
Best Plan: Core ($9/month)
Score: 6/10
Marketing Ops Orchestrating Data Flows
PhantomBuster
Fair
Limited to sales data; not ideal for broad ops.
Best Plan: Pro ($139/month)
Score: 5/10
Make (formerly Integromat) 🏆
Excellent
Perfect for CRM-email-analytics integrations.
Best Plan: Pro ($16/month)
Score: 10/10
Enterprise Building Central Automation Hub
PhantomBuster
Poor
Too specialized; lacks broad governance.
Best Plan: Enterprise (Custom)
Score: 4/10
Make (formerly Integromat) 🏆
Excellent
Enterprise features for compliance and scalability.
Best Plan: Enterprise (Custom)
Score: 10/10
Technical Marketer with API Needs
PhantomBuster
Good
API access but focused on Phantoms.
Best Plan: Pro ($139/month)
Score: 7/10
Make (formerly Integromat) 🏆
Excellent
HTTP modules and custom code for advanced APIs.
Best Plan: Pro ($16/month)
Score: 9/10
SMB Syncing Data Across Tools
PhantomBuster
Fair
Good for lead sync but limited apps.
Best Plan: Starter ($59/month)
Score: 6/10
Make (formerly Integromat) 🏆
Excellent
Affordable multi-app sync with visual ease.
Best Plan: Core ($9/month)
Score: 9/10
B2B Sales Building Pipeline
PhantomBuster 🏆
Excellent
Direct lead extraction to CRM for pipeline growth.
Best Plan: Team ($399/month)
Score: 10/10
Make (formerly Integromat)
Good
Can automate pipeline but less sales-focused.
Best Plan: Teams ($29/month)
Score: 7/10
Non-Technical User Automating Basics
PhantomBuster 🏆
Good
Prebuilts ease entry, but learning curve remains.
Best Plan: Starter ($59/month)
Score: 7/10
Make (formerly Integromat)
Fair
Visual but overwhelming for beginners without guidance.
Best Plan: Core ($9/month)
Score: 5/10
High-Volume Automation Needs
PhantomBuster
Good
Scales with plans but caps on executions.
Best Plan: Team ($399/month)
Score: 8/10
Make (formerly Integromat) 🏆
Excellent
Custom limits in Enterprise; operation-based flexibility.
Best Plan: Enterprise (Custom)
Score: 9/10
Budget-Conscious Automation Starter
PhantomBuster
Fair
Higher entry cost limits accessibility.
Best Plan: Free (limited)
Score: 4/10
Make (formerly Integromat) 🏆
Excellent
Low starting price with solid features.
Best Plan: Core ($9/month)
Score: 9/10
Pros and Cons
PhantomBuster
Pros
- Extensive library of prebuilt Phantoms for common lead generation tasks
- Powerful workflow automation for chaining multiple steps and tools
- Strong fit for LinkedIn and Sales Navigator prospecting at scale
- Data enrichment and integration options with CRMs and spreadsheets
- Execution logs and scheduling provide good visibility and control
- API access for advanced and custom use cases
- Free tier for testing
Cons
- Steep learning curve for non-technical or less technical users
- Requires careful configuration to avoid violating platform terms or limits
- Interface and terminology can feel complex for beginners
- Pricing can become high as usage and team size grow
- Not focused on content creation or social media publishing workflows
- Limited to sales and growth hacking use cases
- No visual drag-and-drop for general workflows
Make (formerly Integromat)
Pros
- Extremely flexible visual scenario builder for complex workflows
- Large catalog of app integrations plus generic HTTP and webhook modules
- Strong data mapping and transformation capabilities
- Suitable for both non-technical users and developers
- Robust scheduling, logging, and error handling features
- Team collaboration with shared workspaces and role-based access
- Low starting price with scalable tiers
- Supports custom code for edge cases
Cons
- Steeper learning curve than simpler automation tools
- Operation-based pricing can become expensive at high volumes
- Complex scenarios can be harder to maintain without strong internal practices
- Interface can feel overwhelming for new or non-technical users
- Some advanced use cases still require technical understanding of APIs and data structures
- No prebuilt templates for niche sales tasks like LinkedIn extraction
- Less specialized for lead generation compared to focused tools
Final Verdict
PhantomBuster and Make are automation powerhouses with different scopes. PhantomBuster targets sales teams with specialized lead generation and data extraction, particularly on LinkedIn. Make is a versatile no-code platform for integrating and automating across any apps, ideal for broader business workflows.
Select PhantomBuster if lead generation on LinkedIn is your core need – its prebuilts deliver fast value. Choose Make for general-purpose automation across apps, where flexibility trumps specialization. For hybrid needs, combine them: PhantomBuster for extraction, Make for integrations.
Overall Scores
PhantomBuster
LinkedIn Focus: 10/10
Lead Generation: 10/10
Value: 6/10
Make (formerly Integromat)
LinkedIn Focus: 7/10
Lead Generation: 6/10
Value: 9/10
Other Comparisons
Explore more tool comparisons to help you make the best decision:
