Make vs Grammarly
Make (formerly Integromat)
- Platform: App integrations and automation
- Best For: Workflow automation across social tools
- Strength: Visual no-code integrations
- Users: Not specified
Starting at $9/month
Grammarly
- Platform: Writing across apps and browsers
- Best For: Content creation and editing
- Strength: AI-powered grammar and tone suggestions
- Users: Not specified
Starting at €12/member/month (billed annually)
Table of Contents
At a Glance
Platform Support
| Feature | Make (formerly Integromat) | Grammarly |
|---|---|---|
| Social Media Integrations | ✓ Integrates with Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn via APIs | ✗ Works across browsers and apps but no direct social integrations |
| Browser and App Extensions | ✗ Web-based platform, no extensions | ✓ Extensions for Chrome, Edge, Safari, and desktop apps |
| Mobile Support | ✗ Web-focused, mobile via browser | ✓ Full mobile keyboard and app support |
| Cross-App Compatibility | ✓ Connects 1000+ apps including social tools | ✓ Integrates with email, docs, and social editors |
Content Creation
| Feature | Make (formerly Integromat) | Grammarly |
|---|---|---|
| AI-Powered Generation | ✗ No content generation, focuses on automation | ✓ Generative AI for drafting, rewriting, and ideation |
| Grammar and Spelling Checks | ✗ Not applicable | ✓ Advanced checks across 400+ rules |
| Tone Detection | ✗ Not applicable | ✓ Analyzes tone for audience perception |
| Automated Content Posting | ✓ Automate posts via workflows | ✗ No posting features |
| Data Transformation for Content | ✓ Map and transform data for social posts | ✗ Not applicable |
Scheduling & Automation
| Feature | Make (formerly Integromat) | Grammarly |
|---|---|---|
| Visual Workflow Builder | ✓ Drag-and-drop scenario builder | ✗ No workflow automation |
| Scheduling Options | ✓ Real-time, interval, on-demand scheduling | ✗ No scheduling |
| Error Handling and Retries | ✓ Detailed logs and retry controls | ✗ Not applicable |
| AI Agents for Workflows | ✗ No AI agents | ✓ AI Agents for multi-step writing tasks |
Integrations & API
| Feature | Make (formerly Integromat) | Grammarly |
|---|---|---|
| Prebuilt App Integrations | ✓ Extensive library for CRM, social, marketing | ✗ Integrates via extensions, no API focus |
| HTTP and Webhooks | ✓ Connect any REST API | ✗ No webhook support |
| Plagiarism Detection | ✗ Not applicable | ✓ Detects against billions of pages |
| Style Guides | ✗ Not applicable | ✓ Enforce organization-wide standards |
Analytics & Reporting
| Feature | Make (formerly Integromat) | Grammarly |
|---|---|---|
| Execution Logs | ✓ Detailed logs for workflows | ✗ No workflow analytics |
| Performance Analytics | ✗ Basic monitoring | ✓ Effective Communication Score and ROI reporting |
| AI Text Detection | ✗ Not applicable | ✓ Detects AI-generated content |
| Team Governance | ✓ Role-based access and monitoring | ✓ Advanced audit logs and controls |
Collaboration & Enterprise
| Feature | Make (formerly Integromat) | Grammarly |
|---|---|---|
| Team Workspaces | ✓ Shared workspaces with roles | ✓ Team features like snippets and analytics |
| Role-Based Access | ✓ Enterprise governance | ✓ Custom roles and permissions |
| Brand Tones | ✗ Not applicable | ✓ Align with company voice |
| Custom Deployments | ✓ Enterprise options with governance | ✓ SAML, SCIM, and BYOK |
Pricing Comparison
Make starts at $9/month with operation-based pricing for automation, while Grammarly's Pro plan is €12/member/month annually for writing features. Make offers better value for automation-heavy users, while Grammarly suits content-focused teams.
Make (formerly Integromat)
Free
Free
Beginners testing basic automations
- Limited operations per month
- Basic access to scenario builder
- Access to a subset of app integrations
- Community support
Core
$9/month
Small teams with moderate automation needs
- Increased monthly operations compared with Free
- Access to most standard app integrations
- Scheduling and basic error handling
- Support for several active scenarios
Pro
$16/month
Growing teams needing advanced features
- Higher monthly operation limits
- Priority execution for scenarios
- More advanced modules and integrations
- Improved support response times
Teams
$29/month
Collaborative teams automating social workflows
- Team workspaces and collaboration features
- Role-based access controls
- Higher operation quotas for growing teams
- More advanced monitoring and governance options
Enterprise
Custom
Large organizations with complex integrations
- Custom operation and data limits
- Dedicated account management and onboarding
- Advanced security, compliance, and governance
- Priority support and SLA options
Grammarly
Free
€0/month
Individuals needing basic writing checks
- Basic grammar, spelling, and punctuation checks
- Tone detection for understanding how writing may sound
- Limited AI prompts (100 prompts per month)
- Works across major browsers and apps
- Access to Grammarly’s web editor and browser extensions
Pro (Annual)
€12/member/month
Professionals enhancing content quality
- Everything in Free
- Advanced clarity and tone suggestions
- Full-sentence rewrites and fluency improvements
- Inclusive language and citation consistency checks
- Plagiarism detection and AI-generated text detection
- Increased AI usage (2,000 AI prompts per member per month)
- Team features like style guide, brand tones, snippets, and analytics
Pro (Monthly)
€30/member/month
Short-term or flexible writing needs
- Everything in Free
- Advanced clarity and tone suggestions
- Full-sentence rewrites and fluency improvements
- Inclusive language and citation consistency checks
- Plagiarism detection and AI-generated text detection
- Increased AI usage (2,000 AI prompts per member per month)
- Team features like style guide, brand tones, snippets, and analytics
Enterprise
Custom
Organizations ensuring brand-consistent communication
- Everything in Pro
- Dedicated support and onboarding
- SAML single sign-on and SCIM provisioning
- Custom roles and permissions with user groups
- Data loss prevention and managed mode
- Application and domain controls with client control options
- Enterprise key management (BYOK) and advanced audit logs
- Cost center visibility and group-level security controls
- Unlimited AI prompts per member per month
- Effective Communication Score and ROI reporting
Education / Institutional Plans (Indicative)
From $25/month (institutional) or $50/year/seat (education)
Educational institutions improving writing
- Institution-focused Grammarly subscriptions with seat-based pricing
- Annual tiered plans with volume discounts for larger seat counts
- Options for 7-day free trials on some institutional campaigns
- Access to advanced writing assistance for students and faculty
Feature Deep Dive
Content Creation Capabilities
Make (formerly Integromat)
Strengths
- Automate content generation from data sources
- Integrate with AI tools for dynamic posts
- Data mapping for personalized social content
Workflow
Connect data sources → Transform content → Automate drafting in tools
Grammarly
Strengths
- Generative AI for drafting and rewriting
- Tone detection and clarity suggestions
- Plagiarism and AI detection for original content
- Style guides for brand-consistent social posts
Workflow
Draft content → AI suggestions → Rewrite and polish → Export to social tools
Grammarly excels at direct content creation and editing with AI assistance, ideal for crafting high-quality social posts. Make supports content creation indirectly through automation and integrations but lacks built-in writing tools. Choose Grammarly for writing quality, Make for automated content flows.
Scheduling & Automation
Make (formerly Integromat)
Strengths
- Visual drag-and-drop for multi-step workflows
- Scheduling: real-time, interval, on-demand
- Error handling, retries, and logging
- Integrate social posting automations
Limitations
- Learning curve for complex scenarios
- Operation costs for high-volume scheduling
Grammarly
Strengths
- AI Agents for multi-step writing tasks
- Seamless integration into writing apps
Limitations
- No scheduling or posting automation
- Focused on writing, not workflow orchestration
Make dominates scheduling and automation with robust workflow tools for social media posting. Grammarly offers AI agents for writing but no true automation for scheduling. For automated social media management, Make is superior; for content prep, Grammarly complements it.
Integrations & API Connectivity
Make (formerly Integromat)
Strengths
- Thousands of prebuilt integrations for social, CRM, analytics
- HTTP modules and webhooks for any API
- Advanced data transformation and aggregation
Workflow
Select apps → Build scenario → Map data → Run automation
Grammarly
Strengths
- Browser extensions for real-time writing in social editors
- Integrates with Google Docs, email, and more
- Enterprise API for custom writing workflows
Limitations
- No broad app integration platform
- Limited to writing contexts
Make is unmatched for integrating social media tools into automated workflows. Grammarly integrates writing assistance into apps but doesn't connect disparate systems. Use Make for cross-tool automation in social management.
Analytics & Reporting
Make (formerly Integromat)
Strengths
- Execution logs and monitoring for workflows
- Error tracking and performance insights
- Team governance and audit features
Limitations
- No content-specific analytics
- Focused on workflow metrics
Grammarly
Strengths
- Effective Communication Score
- Plagiarism and AI detection reports
- Team analytics for writing performance
- ROI reporting in Enterprise
Limitations
- No automation or integration analytics
Grammarly provides deeper writing and communication analytics, useful for social content quality. Make offers workflow execution insights but not content-focused reporting. For social media analytics, integrate Make with dedicated tools; Grammarly enhances content metrics.
Use Case Comparison
Solo Social Media Content Creator
Make (formerly Integromat)
Fair
Useful for basic automations but overkill for solo writing; steep learning curve.
Best Plan: Core ($9/month)
Score: 5/10
Grammarly 🏆
Excellent
AI drafting and editing streamline content creation for posts.
Best Plan: Pro (Annual) (€12/month)
Score: 9/10
Marketing Team Automating Workflows
Make (formerly Integromat) 🏆
Excellent
Connects social tools, CRM for automated posting and lead flows.
Best Plan: Teams ($29/month)
Score: 10/10
Grammarly
Good
Helps with consistent tone but no automation.
Best Plan: Pro (Annual) (€12/month)
Score: 6/10
Enterprise Team Managing Brand Communication
Make (formerly Integromat)
Good
Team workspaces for governance, but not writing-focused.
Best Plan: Enterprise (Custom)
Score: 7/10
Grammarly 🏆
Excellent
Style guides, brand tones, and enterprise security for consistent messaging.
Best Plan: Enterprise (Custom)
Score: 10/10
Startup Automating Social Media
Make (formerly Integromat) 🏆
Excellent
Affordable integrations replace manual processes across tools.
Best Plan: Pro ($16/month)
Score: 9/10
Grammarly
Fair
Useful for content but doesn't automate posting.
Best Plan: Pro (Annual) (€12/month)
Score: 5/10
Content Agency with Team Collaboration
Make (formerly Integromat)
Good
Shared workspaces for workflow sharing, but no writing tools.
Best Plan: Teams ($29/month)
Score: 7/10
Grammarly 🏆
Excellent
Snippets, style guides, and team analytics for collaborative writing.
Best Plan: Enterprise (Custom)
Score: 9/10
Budget-Conscious Social Media Manager
Make (formerly Integromat) 🏆
Excellent
Free tier and low starting price for essential automations.
Best Plan: Free or Core ($9/month)
Score: 9/10
Grammarly
Good
Free basics, but Pro needed for full value.
Best Plan: Free
Score: 7/10
Academic or Educational Content Creator
Make (formerly Integromat)
Fair
Can automate sharing, but not writing-focused.
Best Plan: Core ($9/month)
Score: 4/10
Grammarly 🏆
Excellent
Plagiarism detection and education plans for quality writing.
Best Plan: Education Plans ($50/year/seat)
Score: 10/10
Technical User Automating Social Integrations
Make (formerly Integromat) 🏆
Excellent
Advanced API and data tools for custom social automations.
Best Plan: Pro ($16/month)
Score: 10/10
Grammarly
Poor
No technical integration depth.
Best Plan: Not suitable
Score: 2/10
Remote Team Handling Written Social Content
Make (formerly Integromat)
Good
Collaboration on workflows, but indirect for writing.
Best Plan: Teams ($29/month)
Score: 6/10
Grammarly 🏆
Excellent
Real-time suggestions across apps for distributed teams.
Best Plan: Pro (Annual) (€12/month)
Score: 9/10
Manager Integrating Multiple Social Tools
Make (formerly Integromat) 🏆
Excellent
Central hub for connecting social, analytics, and CRM.
Best Plan: Teams ($29/month)
Score: 10/10
Grammarly
Fair
Enhances writing in tools but no integration hub.
Best Plan: Pro (Annual) (€12/month)
Score: 5/10
Team Ensuring Brand-Consistent Social Posts
Make (formerly Integromat)
Fair
Can automate templates, but no tone enforcement.
Best Plan: Teams ($29/month)
Score: 5/10
Grammarly 🏆
Excellent
Brand tones and style guides enforce consistency.
Best Plan: Enterprise (Custom)
Score: 10/10
High-Volume Social Media Poster
Make (formerly Integromat) 🏆
Excellent
Scalable automations handle volume efficiently.
Best Plan: Enterprise (Custom)
Score: 9/10
Grammarly
Good
AI prompts limited; suits editing but not volume automation.
Best Plan: Enterprise (Custom)
Score: 6/10
Pros and Cons
Make (formerly Integromat)
Pros
- Extremely flexible visual scenario builder for complex workflows
- Large catalog of app integrations plus generic HTTP and webhook modules
- Strong data mapping and transformation capabilities
- Suitable for both non-technical users and developers
- Robust scheduling, logging, and error handling features
- Team collaboration with shared workspaces and role-based access
- Affordable starting price with free tier
Cons
- Steeper learning curve than simpler automation tools
- Operation-based pricing can become expensive at high volumes
- Complex scenarios can be harder to maintain without strong internal practices
- Interface can feel overwhelming for new or non-technical users
- Some advanced use cases still require technical understanding of APIs and data structures
Grammarly
Pros
- Extremely broad coverage across browsers, desktop apps, mobile, and office tools
- Strong core grammar, spelling, and punctuation checking with contextual awareness
- Helpful tone detection and clarity suggestions that go beyond basic correctness
- Integrated generative AI and AI Agents for drafting and rewriting within the same interface
- Robust enterprise features including style guides, brand tones, and Knowledge Share
- Plagiarism and AI detection for compliance
Cons
- Most advanced features, including plagiarism and AI detection, require paid plans
- Pro pricing can feel high for very occasional or light users
- Enterprise pricing is not transparent and requires a sales conversation
- The interface and feature set can feel heavy for narrow use cases like quick social posts
- AI prompt limits on Free and Pro may be restrictive for power users
Final Verdict
Make and Grammarly complement social media management differently: Make automates integrations and workflows for efficient distribution, while Grammarly ensures high-quality, on-brand content creation. They're not direct competitors but powerful when used together.
Choose Make if automation and integrations drive your social media efficiency. Opt for Grammarly if content quality and writing assistance are paramount. For full social management, combine them: use Grammarly for creation and Make for automated distribution.
Overall Scores
Make (formerly Integromat)
Content Creation: 3/10
Value: 9/10
Grammarly
Content Creation: 10/10
Value: 7/10
Other Comparisons
Explore more tool comparisons to help you make the best decision:
